On May 12, Anhui Huainan Intermediate People’s Court made a public judgment in the second instance on Xu Peixi, the former director of Wengguang sports bureau of Panji district, Huainan City, who was known as the “poet official, the ruling rejected Xu Peixi’s appeal and upheld the first-instance judgment of Datong District People’s Court of Huainan City. Xu Peixi committed the crime of accepting bribes and was sentenced to two years in prison and fined RMB 130,000; The proceeds of the crime of accepting bribes were recovered by RMB 100,000 yuan and handed over to the state treasury.
The second trial found out: the original judgment confirmed that Xu Peixi illegally accepted Zhao’s double, su moumei’s property totaled 100000 yuan and sought benefits for others. There were witnesses Zhao moushuang and Su moumei’s testimony during the investigation phase, and there were su moujiang, the testimony of Jin mouyong and other witnesses was confirmed. The above evidence can be confirmed with Xu Peixi’s confession of guilt during the investigation stage, and there are explanations of the situation of the case, the process of solving the case, written decision of case-filing, xu Peixi household registration certificate and other relevant documentary certificates shall be confirmed. All the above evidences are proved and cross-examined by the trial of the first instance and verified to be true and confirmed according to law.
The court of second instance held that Xu Peixi, as a national staff member, took advantage of the facility of power to accept the property of the trustee for several times before and after seeking benefits for the trustee, totaling 100000 yuan, which was a large amount and his behavior constituted a crime of accepting bribes, it should be punished according to law. According to the fact, nature, plot, degree of social harm and other circumstances of Xu Peixi’s crime, the original judgment imposed all the penalties. The facts of the original judgment are clear, the evidence is true and sufficient, the conviction is accurate, the applicable law is correct, and the sentence is appropriate. The trial procedure is legal. Therefore, the above final judgment was made.
On May 12, Anhui Huainan Intermediate People’s Court made a public judgment in the second instance on Xu Peixi, the former director of Wengguang sports bureau of Panji district, Huainan City, who was known as the “poet official, ruling rejected Xu Peixi’s appeal and maintained the first instance of Datong District People’s Court of Huainan City